Trucking Attorney Explains Federal Crackdown on CDL Mills
Why the Crackdown is Important From a Trucking Attorney Perspective
Our office is a resource for injured people looking for a trucking attorney. We are aware of trends in trucking accidents across Indiana and Kentucky. In response to dangerous recent trends the Trump administration expanded its effort to remove unsafe and unqualified commercial drivers from American highways. On August 31, 2026, Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy announced new enforcement actions against commercial driver’s license training providers.
The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) immediately removed more than 110 entry-level driver training providers from its Training Provider Registry. Those schools had trained more than 5,000 drivers who later failed federal English-language proficiency requirements. FMCSA also issued more than 160 notices of proposed removal after investigators found other serious violations.
Federal investigators discovered schools with inadequate training space, unlicensed instructors, missing assessment records, and questionable classroom facilities. The Department of Homeland Security also targeted more than 200 training schools across 23 states for additional inspections to crack down on fraud.
The crackdown may directly improve highway safety in Kentucky and Indiana. Commercial drivers frequently travel through both states on major freight corridors. When a Commercial driver’s license (CDL) mill certifies an unqualified driver, that driver can carry the resulting danger far beyond the state that issued the license.
What CDL Mills Do
A “CDL mill” generally refers to a training provider that produces commercial drivers without delivering the instruction or evaluation required by federal law. Some providers may rush students through training. Others may employ unqualified instructors, use inadequate facilities, or falsely certify that a student completed required work. One of the first things an experienced trucking attorney will do during a deposition of the at fault truck driver is inquire into his training and experience.
Federal law does not allow a school simply to collect tuition and issue a training certificate. Under 49 U.S.C. § 31305, the Secretary of Transportation must establish minimum commercial-driver testing and training requirements. The statute requires written tests, driving tests, effective instruction, and training that develops the skills needed to operate a commercial vehicle safely.
The statute also requires training providers to demonstrate that their programs meet federal requirements. Therefore, a provider cannot lawfully substitute paperwork for meaningful instruction.
The Commercial Vehicle Training Association and the National Association of Publicly Funded Truck Driving Schools supported FMCSA’s emergency removal of the 110 providers. The organizations explained that self-certification allowed noncompliant providers to enter the federal registry without first submitting key licensing, curriculum, and fitness records. They also stated that these providers threatened highway safety.
Federal Rules Require Real Commercial-Driver Training
Federal regulations establish national standards for entry-level commercial drivers. These requirements apply to drivers seeking certain CDLs or endorsements. The licensing requirement is a minimum certification that a trucking attorney will focus on when investigating the causes of a personal injury or death suffered in a truck wreck.

49 C.F.R. Part 380, Subpart F governs entry-level driver training. The rules cover theory instruction and behind-the-wheel training. They also establish standards for:
- training providers
- instructors, vehicles
- facilities
- curricula
- student assessments
Under 49 C.F.R. § 380.703, a provider must follow an approved curriculum. It must also use proper facilities, qualified instructors, and suitable training vehicles. In addition, the provider must hold any license or authorization required by the state where it conducts in-person training.
The regulation gives FMCSA the authority to audit or investigate a provider’s operations. Every provider must attest that it meets the federal requirements before it joins the Training Provider Registry.
These safeguards serve an important purpose. A tractor-trailer requires different judgment, training, and control than a passenger vehicle. Drivers must understand braking distances, inspections, blind spots, railroad crossings, emergency maneuvers, cargo issues, and other safety concerns.
A Trucking Attorney Reviews Federal Testing Standards
Federal regulations require training providers to measure a student’s actual proficiency. 49 C.F.R. § 380.715 requires written assessments for the theory portion of the curriculum. A trainee must earn an overall score of at least 80 percent.
Furthermore, 49 C.F.R. § 383.23 generally prohibits a person from operating a commercial motor vehicle unless that person passes federally compliant knowledge and driving-skills tests. The driver must also possess the appropriate CDL.
Instructors must also evaluate and document each trainee’s behind-the-wheel skills. A provider cannot satisfy that duty by giving a student a certificate without conducting a meaningful evaluation.
The Los Angeles Times recently published an article on the driving schools crack down. It stated the FMCSA, “issued notices seeking to shut down another 160 training schools where they said they found unlicensed instructors, missing documentation and inadequate space for drivers to learn necessary maneuvers.” This article goes on to state that drivers certified by those schools were linked to 239 truck accident deaths. The fatality number was a little unnerving for even this trucking attorney. I immediately thought about my family sharing the roads with these ticking time-bombs.
When a school ignores these requirements, it weakens the entire licensing process. It places an unprepared driver behind the wheel of a vehicle that weighs many times more than a family car. More importantly, it causes real physical injuries and death.
English Proficiency Supports Trucking Safety
Federal law requires more than the physical ability to steer and brake a commercial vehicle. A driver must also communicate and understand important information on the road.
Under 49 C.F.R. § 391.11, a commercial driver must read and speak English well enough to communicate with the public. The driver must also understand highway signs and signals, answer official questions, and complete required reports and records.
This rule supports several everyday safety tasks. Commercial drivers must read warning signs, understand detour instructions, respond to police officers, and communicate after a collision. They may also need to understand hazardous-condition warnings or directions at inspection stations.
A recent article by The Hill quoted Todd Spencer, the president of the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association, which also supports the DOT crackdown. Mr. Spencer told The Hill that it is “basic common sense that anyone operating an 80,000-pound commercial vehicle on public roadways should be properly trained, able to read critical road signs, follow emergency instructions, and communicate with law enforcement and first responders in English.”
The rule applies to driver qualifications, not ethnicity or national origin. A driver’s birthplace does not determine driving ability. Federal regulators should apply objective safety standards consistently to every applicant, school, examiner, carrier, and driver.
A Trucking Attorney Explains the Benefits for Kentucky and Indiana
Kentucky sits along several major commercial transportation routes. Interstate 64 connects Louisville and Lexington. Interstate 65 carries traffic between Louisville and Bowling Green. Interstate 75 moves commercial vehicles through northern and eastern Kentucky. These roads also connect local motorists with trucks that began their trips in other states.
Indiana also serves as a major link in the national freight network. Commercial traffic regularly travels through Indianapolis, southern Indiana, and communities near Louisville. Interstate 65 connects Kentucky and Indiana, while other interstate routes carry trucks toward Chicago, Ohio, and the rest of the Midwest.
The trucking attorney team at our firm works hard to seek justice for injured people across Kentucky and Indiana. However, we are contacted after a catastrophic accident. This initiative attempts to avoid the catastrophic accident altogether.
Going to the Source
Kentucky and Indiana cannot eliminate unsafe interstate trucking practices by regulating only Kentucky and Indiana based schools. A driver may obtain training and a CDL elsewhere before entering the states with a commercial load.
Federal enforcement addresses that problem at its source. Removing a noncompliant provider will prevent the school from certifying future drivers. Audits encourage legitimate schools to maintain better records, hire qualified instructors, and conduct honest assessments.
Federal Collaboration with States
The federal government’s new Joint Task Force Crossroads of America specifically includes federal prosecutors and enforcement agencies serving Indiana and nearby states. That regional focus may help investigators identify fraudulent licensing schemes, improper testing, false records, and other misconduct that crosses state lines. The inevitable report resulting from their investigation will aid the trucking attorney with a treasure-trove of information to use in personal injury claims and wrongful death suits well into the future.
Stronger oversight should also protect reputable truck drivers and training schools. Legitimate schools spend time and money on qualified instructors, suitable vehicles, safe practice areas, and proper assessments. CDL mills gain an unfair advantage when they skip those obligations.
Removing dishonest providers helps preserve the value of a legitimate CDL. It also supports the professional drivers who follow the rules and transport goods safely.
Contact a Kentucky and Indiana Trucking Attorney
A collision involving a tractor-trailer can cause catastrophic injuries or death. These cases often involve several responsible parties, complex federal regulations, electronic records, and evidence that can quickly disappear. Do not wait to seek help from a qualitied trucking attorney.
Stein Whatley Astorino, PLLC represents people injured in commercial truck wrecks throughout Kentucky and Indiana. Our truck accident attorneys investigate drivers, motor carriers, maintenance contractors, brokers, and other parties when the evidence supports their involvement.
Federal action against CDL mills represents an important safety measure. Still, regulators cannot undo the harm after an unsafe driver causes a collision. If you or a family member suffered injuries in a truck crash, contact Stein Whatley Astorino, PLLC to discuss your legal options.
The initial case evaluation is free and confidential. 502.553.4750
This article provides general information and does not constitute legal advice.



